HOMESITEMAP

Practice Areas
PRACTICE AREAS
Federal Defense
State Defense

Attorney Profiles
ATTORNEY PROFILES
Robert Malove
Benson Weintraub

Resources
RESOURCES
Current News
FAQ
Links

Contact Us
CONTACT
Directions
Contact Us


Board Certified Expert in Criminal Law by the Florida BAR



• accounting fraud •
1 of 23 • Previous | INDEX | Next


Accounting Fraud Accounting scandals, or corporate accounting scandals are political and business scandals which arise with the disclosure of misdeeds by trusted executives of large public corporations. Such misdeeds typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of corporate assets or underreporting the existence of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations or affiliates. In public companies, this type of "creative accounting" can amount to fraud and investigations are typically launched by government oversight agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Like other forms of white collar fraud, the objective of accounting fraud is to accomplish a desired result by deception, trickery, concealment, and/or dishonesty
Obviously, most accounting fraud takes place to affect the performance of publicly traded corporations. Along with securities violations, money laundering charges may be brought against a defendant. The distinguishing characteristic placing these offenses into the accounting world is that the individual charged is an accountant or agent for an accounting firm and is acting within the scope of his or her employment. One of the more famous instances involving accounting fraud is the collapse of Enron.

The key elements of accounting fraud may be either violations of federal law under today's applicable statutes include such acts as: 1) insider trading, 2) buying or selling of securities not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 3) willfully making false statements or omissions of fact in documents filed with the SEC, and/or 4) engaging in interstate communications with prospective purchasers of securities, where such communications employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, or contain false statements or omissions of fact calculated to mislead or converting money or property gained from illegal activities into money that appears to have been legally earned.

How have the courts defined accounting fraud violations?
Any accountant who administers an audit of an issuer of securities to which 15 U.S.C. § 78j-1(a) applies, must keep up all audit or review papers for a period of 5 years from the end of the fiscal period in which the audit or review was completed, under section 1520 18 U.S.C. § 1520(a)(1).

Also, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall make known, such rules and regulations, as are reasonably necessary, relating to the absorption of relevant records such as documents that form the basis of an audit or review, memoranda, correspondence, communications, other documents, and records (including electronic records) which are created, sent, or received in connection with an audit or review and contain conclusions, opinions, analyses, or financial data relating to such an audit or review, which is conducted by any accountant who conducts an audit of an issuer of securities to which 15 U.S.C. § 78j-1(a) applies. The Commission may, amend or supplement the rules and regulations that it is required to promulgate under this section, after proper notice and an opportunity for comment, in order to ensure that such rules and regulations efficiently comply with the purposes of this section.

Possible Penalties:
The punishment for a knowing of willful violation of section 1520(a) is a fine, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, and/or both. 18 U.S.C. § 1520(b).


1 of 23 • Previous | INDEX | Next


© Copyright 2006 Robert David Malove, PA. All Rights Reserved.
NOTICE: Nothing contained in this site is intended to constitute or provide any legal advice of any kind whatsoever or to create an attorney-client relationship of any kind and should not be relied on in making any decisions regarding your legal rights. Each case is factually and legally unique and consultation with an experienced white collar defense attorney is essential to properly evaluate and assess a particular person or company's unique situation. The results obtained depend on the facts of each case.