| 
 
 
 
  There 
            are several white collar crimes that someone may be 
            charged with in relation to import crimes but one 
            of the most common charge is for knowingly and fraudulently 
            importing merchandise into the United States contrary 
            to the law. To 
              be convicted of smuggling, in most federal jurisdictions, 
              an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) must 
              present sufficient evidence that when submitted 
              to a jury or judge would prove beyond a reasonable 
              doubt:1. Such said defendant knowingly imported merchandise 
              into the United States;
 2. Such said defendant's importation was opposite 
              to the applicable law; and
 3. Such said defendant knew the importation was 
              contrary to law.
 How have 
              the courts defined import violations?A. Failure to oblige with requirements such as the 
              reporting of merchandise that is being brought into 
              the country is just as lawfully wrong as failing 
              to pay custom fees. In one particular case, the 
              court convicted defendants for conspiracy for illegally 
              brigning a snowmobile from Canada to the United 
              States just that: illegal. The defendants had purchased 
              the vehicle in Canada, giving a false Canadian address, 
              had never reported snowmobile at any customs station, 
              and had concealed the vehicle in a barn in Vermont. 
              United States v. McKee, 220 F.2d 266 (2d Cir. 1955).
 B. There must be proof of an importation when a 
              defendant is alleged to have imported merchandise 
              unlawfully. In one case, a defendant was accused 
              of wrongfully importing liquor from Canada, there 
              had to be proof that it was actually imported and 
              the fact that the accused ran from the officers 
              and labels on the liquor indicating they were in 
              fact made in Canada were not sufficient evidence 
              for conviction. Kennedy v. United States, 4 F.2d 
              131 (9th Cir. 1930).
 C. The phrase “covertly introduce” and 
              the word “smuggle” mean pretty much 
              the same thing, since both refer to the acts of 
              the defendant by concealment or fraud introducing 
              goods into the United States, yet avoiding customs. 
              United States v. Claybourn, 180 F. Supp. 448 (S.D. 
              Cal. 1960).
 Possible 
              Penalties:One may be found guilty of a felony, put in prison 
              for up to 5 years, and fined up to $250,000.
 Most 
              often, the State’s Assistant U.S. Attorney 
              (AUSA) will secure a Federal Indictment from a Federal 
              Grand Jury and charge a defendant not only with 
              an import crime, but also with wire, money, bank, 
              and mail fraud, money laundering, or RICO crimes, 
              and conspiracy to commit the crimes mentioned earlier. 
              One should also be aware that since 1987 parole 
              has been abolished in the Federal System. Expungement, 
              which is theremoval of conviction from public records, 
              is also not available.
 
 
 
 
 |