HOMESITEMAP

Practice Areas
PRACTICE AREAS
Federal Defense
State Defense

Attorney Profiles
ATTORNEY PROFILES
Robert Malove
Benson Weintraub

Resources
RESOURCES
Current News
FAQ
Links

Contact Us
CONTACT
Directions
Contact Us


Board Certified Expert in Criminal Law by the Florida BAR



• import crimes •
12 of 23 • Previous | INDEX | Next


Import Crimes There are several white collar crimes that someone may be charged with in relation to import crimes but one of the most common charge is for knowingly and fraudulently importing merchandise into the United States contrary to the law.

To be convicted of smuggling, in most federal jurisdictions, an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) must present sufficient evidence that when submitted to a jury or judge would prove beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. Such said defendant knowingly imported merchandise into the United States;
2. Such said defendant's importation was opposite to the applicable law; and
3. Such said defendant knew the importation was contrary to law.

How have the courts defined import violations?
A. Failure to oblige with requirements such as the reporting of merchandise that is being brought into the country is just as lawfully wrong as failing to pay custom fees. In one particular case, the court convicted defendants for conspiracy for illegally brigning a snowmobile from Canada to the United States just that: illegal. The defendants had purchased the vehicle in Canada, giving a false Canadian address, had never reported snowmobile at any customs station, and had concealed the vehicle in a barn in Vermont. United States v. McKee, 220 F.2d 266 (2d Cir. 1955).
B. There must be proof of an importation when a defendant is alleged to have imported merchandise unlawfully. In one case, a defendant was accused of wrongfully importing liquor from Canada, there had to be proof that it was actually imported and the fact that the accused ran from the officers and labels on the liquor indicating they were in fact made in Canada were not sufficient evidence for conviction. Kennedy v. United States, 4 F.2d 131 (9th Cir. 1930).
C. The phrase “covertly introduce” and the word “smuggle” mean pretty much the same thing, since both refer to the acts of the defendant by concealment or fraud introducing goods into the United States, yet avoiding customs. United States v. Claybourn, 180 F. Supp. 448 (S.D. Cal. 1960).

Possible Penalties:
One may be found guilty of a felony, put in prison for up to 5 years, and fined up to $250,000.

Most often, the State’s Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) will secure a Federal Indictment from a Federal Grand Jury and charge a defendant not only with an import crime, but also with wire, money, bank, and mail fraud, money laundering, or RICO crimes, and conspiracy to commit the crimes mentioned earlier. One should also be aware that since 1987 parole has been abolished in the Federal System. Expungement, which is theremoval of conviction from public records, is also not available.



12 of 23 • Previous | INDEX | Next


© Copyright 2006 Robert David Malove, PA. All Rights Reserved.
NOTICE: Nothing contained in this site is intended to constitute or provide any legal advice of any kind whatsoever or to create an attorney-client relationship of any kind and should not be relied on in making any decisions regarding your legal rights. Each case is factually and legally unique and consultation with an experienced white collar defense attorney is essential to properly evaluate and assess a particular person or company's unique situation. The results obtained depend on the facts of each case.