Home
>> Federal Defense
>> Corporate Fraud
MIAMI AND FORT LAUDERDALE CORPORATE
FRAUD ATTORNEY
Attorney
Representation in Miami, Florida Since 1984
There
are no exact individual laws that specifically address
Corporate Fraud Crimes, but federal offenses such
as wire, security and mail fraud exemplify the most
commonly charged federal crimes. While wire, security,
and mail fraud charges are always brought against
individuals, the one outstanding characteristic placing
these offenses into the corporate world is that the
particular person being charged is an employee working
for a corporation and is acting out their charges
during their course of employment. As
in many other forms of white collar fraud, most
objectives of corporate fraud are to accomplish
a desired result by concealment, trickery, deception
and/or dishonesty. The essential elements may be
either through the use of the United States Postal
Service or other private/commercial interstate carriers;
placing this form of fraud into the purview of "wire
fraud" is the use of interstate wire communications
or other forms of facilitating communications, such
as television, radio, microwaves, or the internet
or by violations of federal law under today's applicable
statutes include such acts as: 1) insider trading,
2) buying or selling securities not registered with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 3)
willfully making false statements or omissions of
fact in documents filed with the SEC, and/or 4)
engaging in interstate communications with prospective
purchasers or securities, where such communications
employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud,
or contain false statements or omissions of fact
calculated to mislead.
How have
the courts defined Corporate fraud violations?
A. Deprivation of the right to a defendant's honest
services is one of the types of scheme that satisfies
the first element of mail fraud. Properly interpreted,
"honest services" are services owed to
an employer under state law and, thus, the government
must prove that the defendant deprived the employer
of such services. United States v. Caldwell, 302
F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2002).
B. In order to establish good faith in a wire fraud
case involving investment in a business, the defendant
must prove that he actually believed the information
that he sent to his investors, not that he believed
that he would eventually pay them back. An instruction
informing the jury that a defendant's honest belief
that he will ultimately be able to perform what
he has promised is not in itself a defense to the
crimes charged is a proper instruction. United States
v. Mabrook, 301 F.3d 503 (7th Cir. 2002).
C. A tippee assumes a fiduciary responsibility to
the shareholders of a corporation not to trade on
material nonpublic information only when the insider
has breached his fiduciary duty to the shareholders
by disclosing the information to the tippee and
the tippee knows or should know that there has been
a breach. A tippee cannot be held liable for a federal
securities fraud violation simply because he or
she in fact traded in securities or helped others
to trade in securities based on the material nonpublic
information. Rather, the key factor was the tipper's
intent in providing the information. United States
v. Falcone, 257 F.3d 256 (2nd Cir. 2001).
Possible
Penalties:
For wire and mail fraud, one may be found guilty
of a felony, put in prison for up to 5 years, and
fined up to $250,000. If a financial institution
is involved, one may be put in prison for up to
30 years and fined up to $1,000,000. For Securities
Fraud, one may be found guilty of a felony, put
in prison for up to 10 years and fined up to $1,000,000.
A corporation committing securities fraud may be
fined up to $2,500,000.
Most
often, the State’s Assistant U.S. Attorney
(AUSA) will secure a Federal Indictment from a Federal
Grand Jury and charge a defendant not only with
corporate fraud crimes, but also with securities
fraud, wire fraud , bank fraud, money laundering,
public corruption, or RICO crimes and conspiracy
to commit the aforementioned crimes. One should
also be aware that since 1987 parole has been abolished
in the Federal System. Expungement (removal of conviction
from public records) is also not available.
|