HOMESITEMAP

Practice Areas
PRACTICE AREAS
Federal Defense
State Defense

Attorney Profiles
ATTORNEY PROFILES
Robert
Benson Weintraub

Resources
RESOURCES
Current News
FAQ
Links

Contact Us
CONTACT
Directions
Contact Us


Board Certified Expert in Criminal Law by the Florida BAR

Home >> Federal Defense >> Drug Crimes

MIAMI AND FORT LAUDERDALE CRIMINAL ATTORNEY

Attorney Representation in Miami, Florida Since 1984

• drug crimes •
8 of 23 • Previous | INDEX | Next


Drug Crimes It is a violation of federal law to manufacture, distribute, dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance or a counterfeit substance. An individual may be subject to criminal punishments as a result from any one of numerous wrongful acts regarding controlled substances.

Most federal drug prosecutions are for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. The majority involve the following drugs:
a) Cocaine;
b) Cocaine Base (crack);
c) Heroin;
d) Marijuana; and
e) Methamphetamine.

In many jurisdictions, to be convicted of possession with the intent to deliver a controlled substance, an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) must present evidence that when submitted to a jury or judge would prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. Such said defendant knowingly possessed a controlled substance;
2. Such said substance was in fact a controlled substance;
3. Such said defendant possessed the substance with the intent to distribute it; and
4. Such said substance was at least of a certain quantity.

How have the courts defined drug violations?

A. When there is intent to deliver marijuana and heroin, such as in this case, the defendant violated 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). United States v. Romero-Reyna, 867 F.2d 834 (5th Cir. 1989).
B. Knowingly manufacturing or possessing with the intent to distribute marijuana violates 21 USC § 841 (a)(1). United States v. Wright, 991 F.2d 1182 (4th Cir. 1993).
C. Possession with the intent to distribute cocaine violates 21 USC § 841 (a)(1). United States v. White, 81 F.3d 775 (8th Cir. 1996).

Possible Penalties

The punishment for any drug crime depends on exactly what kind of drug/substance the defendant is being charged with, the amountof the substance, and if there were any deaths during any drug plans. If there were any guns present during a drug transaction may also affect a potential sentence. The range of punishment may be from 0-20 years, mandatory minimum of 5-40 years or mandatory minimum of 10 years-life.

Most often, the State’s Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) will secure a Federal Indictment from a Federal Grand Jury and charge a defendant not only with a drug crime, but also with money laundering, RICO crimes, and conspiracy to commit the aforementioned crimes. One should also be aware that since 1987 parole has been abolished in the Federal System. Expungement (removal of conviction from public records) is also not available.


8 of 23 • Previous | INDEX | Next

Federal Practice Areas
  • Accounting Fraud
  • Antitrust Violations
  • Bank Fraud Crimes
  • Bankruptcy Fraud
  • Computer Crimes
  • Conspiracy
  • Corporate Fraud
  • Environmental Crimes
  • Export Crimes
  • Health Care Fraud
  • Import Crimes
  • Mail Fraud
  • Money Laundering
  • Ponzi Schemes
  • Pornography Possession
  • Pornography Distribution
  • Other Pornography Offenses
  • Public Corruption
  • RICO
  • Securities Fraud
  • Tax Evasion
  • Wire Fraud
  • © Copyright 2006, All Rights Reserved.
    Home | Federal Criminal Defense | State Criminal Defense | Attorney Profile | Attorney Links | Contact Us | Sitemap
    NOTICE: Nothing contained in this site is intended to constitute or provide any legal advice of any kind whatsoever or to create an attorney-client relationship of any kind and should not be relied on in making any decisions regarding your legal rights. Each case is factually and legally unique and consultation with an experienced white collar defense attorney is essential to properly evaluate and assess a particular person or company's unique situation. The results obtained depend on the facts of each case.